Skip to main content
B.S. Footprint logo
What's Yours?
title=
But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.  – Nancy Pelosi
more quotes...
  • Home
  • Popular B.S.
  • Sightings
  • Quotations
  • Merch
  • LINK-to-us!
  • Vote Smarter, Not Harder
  • Visual BS
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact us
Home » Blogs » bsfootprint's blog

Japanese reactor fallout: Meltdowns are a safety feature, and the U.S. West Coast is NOT at risk from radiation (UPDATE 5)

Submitted by bsfootprint on Wed, 03/16/2011 - 08:33
bsfootprint's picture

Links

Potassium Iodide Pills: Don't do that! (Derek Lowe)

Washington State DOH radiation monitoring

Latest on Japanese Radiation

Changing Weather Pattern Reduces Radiation Risk, Brings Improved Weather

The U.S. West Coast is NOT at Risk from Radiation

Latest Pacific Trajectories From the Japanese Reactor and Amazing Rainshadow

market-ticker.org brings the facts.

Is radiation from Japan heading to the U.S.?

You Can Stop Worrying About A Radiation Disaster In Japan -- Here's Why (In-depth blog post by Josef Oehmen of MIT)

MIT NSE Nuclear Information Hub - Excellent source of fact-based information

Understanding the radioactivity at Fukushima by Prof. Ben Monreal UCSB Department of Physics

Update 5: Added Potassium Iodide Pills: Don't do that! to links
We see breathless, worry-inducing news headlines about Japan's nuclear reactor disasters. References to Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, meltdowns, containment breaches.

It's bad, no doubt about it. Japan is certain to experience long-term impacts from these reactor failures. But it's best to avoid getting caught up in the borderline hysteria that seems to have taken hold of most media sources. Remember, when reading news headlines, if it bleeds, it leads. While the headlines are dramatic attention-getters, what are the real risks?

For example, when you hear about a possible meltdown, do you picture a horror scenario where all life on earth is threatened due to radioactive fallout? Will the nuclear reactor core burn its way down into the earth's crust, as in The China Syndrome? Or, is a meltdown actually a safety feature, intended to prevent major catastrophe?

Knowledge is the antidote

Here's information that might help counter the fear-inducing headlines.

First, here's an article (at Pajamas Media, no less) that describes the Japanese reactor designs, and why the reported explosions aren't quite as catastrophic as the headlines make them out to be. It discusses the containment mechanisms and the difference between containment vessels and containment buildings–important to know if you want to pick apart the headlines and avoid misreading the situation.


Winds (shown in red) likely to carry fallout into Pacific ocean. Source: Meteorologist Cliff Mass

It's interesting to note that (according to the article) a core meltdown is a safety feature–if cooling systems fail, and the core is exposed (which has happened in Japan, at least partially) then the core is supposed to "melt down" and spread out on the graphite floor of the containment vessel, where the nuclear reactions will stop and it will begin to cool. That's what the containment vessel is designed to do, and it's one of the main reasons why Chernobyl was such a disaster: it didn't have a containment vessel, so when the core cooling failed and the core started to burn, it did not spread out - it continued to burn and release radioactive particles into the atmosphere.

In order to evaluate the severity of a core meltdown, you need additional information: is the containment vessel floor intact? Are there other factors that make the meltdown event worse than planned?

From my reading of the material, as long as the containment vessel performs as designed, a core meltdown is supposed to stop the reactor core's reactions. That doesn't mean there won't be atmospheric radiation releases (gases vented from the containment vessel), but it should be viewed as a safety feature rather than as an uncontrolled, unplanned outcome. That doesn't make it a Good Thing–it's bad, but it's better than what happened at Chernobyl.

Added: The real problem seems to be the spent fuel pool which does not have a containment vessel, and latest reports say that the spent fuel pool has no water, which means the fuel rods are uncovered, making a fire and explosion possible if not likely–which is probably worse than a core meltdown inside a containment vessel.

Wind patterns and fallout risks for the U.S.

Now, what about radioactive fallout? There have been intentional and unintentional releases of radioactive gases from the Japanese power plants. Where will the winds carry them?

What's the probable risk for people in the U.S. of A.? Are we likely to be hit with dangerous radioactive fallout? The current wind patterns indicate that fallout will probably not reach the mainland U.S.

Meteorologist Cliff Mass points out that the current wind patterns are favorable, and, that most radiation making its way to us should dissipate due to atmospheric mixing and precipitation.

Stop worrying

You Can Stop Worrying About A Radiation Disaster In Japan -- Here's Why (In-depth blog post by Josef Oehmen of MIT)

MIT NSE Nuclear Information Hub - Excellent source of fact-based information

Share this
Filed under
  • The News
  • If it bleeds, it leads
  • Never waste a perfectly good crisis
  • Paranoia
  • Chernobyl
  • Fukushima Daiichi
  • Nuclear Fallout
  • Nuclear Power
  • Potassium Iodide
  • Three Mile Island
  • bsfootprint's blog
  • Login to post comments
  • Share this
  • Permalink

Similar Content (auto-generated)

  • Why not regulate speech as seriously as toys?
  • If you aren't allowed to own (and carry) a gun, you shouldn't be allowed to hold public office
  • Hope and Change, high gasoline price edition
  • Real-time radiation monitoring and radiation levels on the West Coast
  • Encryption won't save you

Recent posts

  • The Road to Serfdom
  • Screwed By Google
  • Hope n' Change Web Comics
  • Obama's unprecedented stance: Supreme Court shouldn...
  • Democracy is the theory that the common people know what...
more

Popular content

Today's:

  • We did better with the nineteenth-century gold standard and passive central banks, with currency boards, or even with 'free banking.'
  • Chart: Gasoline price relative to gold
  • The beauty about [Social Security] is that it is actuarially unsound. Everyone who reaches retirement age is given benefit privileges that far exceed anything he has paid in.

All time:

  • Chart: Gasoline price relative to gold
  • B.S. abounds. Help uncover it.
  • We did better with the nineteenth-century gold standard and passive central banks, with currency boards, or even with 'free banking.'

Last viewed:

  • I'll know it's a gold bubble when...
  • Lew Rockwell
  • Happy Income Tax Day, 2011
Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

BS Merchandise

BS Merchandise
BS Merchandise

Keep the BS Coming!

Your donations help ensure a steady stream of BS.

Subscribe to B.S. Footprint by e-mail

Delivered by FeedBurner

Hawt Links

  • Anti-Wikipedia resource (235)
  • Basic laws of human stupidity (230)
  • Best of the Web Today (217)
  • Big Lies of Science (190)
  • Cargo Cult Science by Richard Feynman (188)
  • Business Insider (178)
  • Dying of Money (PDF) (174)
  • First Tuesday Journal (california real estate) (171)
  • Ric Werme's Guide to Watts Up With That (147)
  • No Dogma (in climate science) (143)
more…
Locations of visitors to this page
Contents copyright © 2009-2012, bsfootprint.com. All rights reserved worldwide. Materials may be reproduced with full attribution and a link back to this site.