Submitted by bsfootprint on Sun, 03/25/2012 - 11:04
I'll let you in on a little secret. I despise Obamacare much the same way I despise other nanny-state laws, but a lot more.
I ride motorcycles. Have done so all my adult life, and for a few years before that. I wear a helmet and other protective gear.
I drive and ride in cars. I wear seat belts.
I use a hands-free set on my cell phone while driving.
I did those things long before the 'law'* required it. Because, though I may not be as smart or progressive as some of you, I wanted to take reasonable precautions. Because it was obviously in my best interests. Not because it was good for society.
Virtue was its own reward. It's called rational self-interest.
When legislators and executives passed 'laws' making those personal choices mandatory, judges upheld them, bureaucrats and police enforced them, and 'society' approved of them, my reaction was: fuck you. Fuck you, legislators. Fuck you, Governor. Fuck you, society. Fuck you all.
Fuck you, if you think 'social costs' give you the right to point guns at me and tell me what to do in order to help reduce them. Take your social costs arguments and stuff them straight up your fucking asses.
You created many of those social costs and forced them on virtuous people by expanding government's role in private matters. You made them worse.
Fuckwads.
You're taking us straight to the Depths of Hell or whatever other form of eternal damnation you care to believe in. And if you don't believe in such a thing, you're taking us town the fucking toilet.
After these 'laws' were passed, I continued wearing helmets and seat belts. I bought cars with airbags (what choice did I have?) I still use hands-free sets on my cell phone while driving. Because I want to take reasonable precautions for myself, my family, for loved ones. Oh, and in some cases, because I don't want to get busted. Not because I'm worried about social costs.
But you statists and progressives killed the joy of doing something because it's smart, because it's safer, because it's obviously beneficial. You turned an act of virtue into mere compliance, and in some cases created yet another tool in the vast and ever-expanding arsenal of victimless crimes.
I have health care insurance. I had it before 'Obamacare' was passed into 'law'. I had health care insurance, even though I am not as smart as President Obama, Ms. Pelosi, and the rest of the petty tyrants who supported this abomination.
I will continue to have health insurance after the abomination known a 'Obamacare' takes effect. Until someday I won't.
All you've done by forcing these 'for your own good' 'laws' down our throats is to put nails in your coffin. People who are virtuous for its own sake will despise you, and you lose their respect and support.
Those people may be a tiny minority, and hence you don't give a shit about them since this is, after all, a de facto democracy** (and swaying the masses is what it's all about, right?)–but eventually all you have left to support you are those without innate virtue–those who want something for nothing, who want someone else to carry them, who are willing to trade their liberties for a little security mess of pottage. Those who need to be told what to do, how to live, how to think. Frankly, I can't think of a worse fate.
That minority of virtuous, productive, self-reliant people are the ones who keep this mess from going straight down the crapper. So go ahead and pass another 'for your own good' 'law'. Pass a thousand more.
* These are not laws -- they are perversions of law. Go read Bastiat, and come back when you are ready to have an adult, intelligent conversation about the proper role (and limits) of the law.
** It's actually a Republic, a federation of States, or, at least it was a long time ago. But we moderne Americans like to think of the late great American Republic as a great democracy; who am I to argue with popular opinion? To all you democracy-cultists: You know what you want, and you deserve to get it good and hard.
In February 2011, the Department of Homeland Security announced that the agency planned to implement a program that would monitor media content, including social media data. The proposed initiatives would gather information from "online forums, blogs, public websites, and messages boards" and disseminate information to "federal, state, local, and foreign government and private sector partners." The program would be executed, in part, by individuals who established fictitious usernames and passwords to create covert social media profiles to spy on other users. The agency stated it would store personal information for up to five years.
[...]
The records reveal that the DHS is paying General Dynamics to monitor the news. The agency instructed the company to monitor for "[media] reports that reflect adversely on the U.S. Government, DHS, or prevent, protect, respond government activities."
[...]
The DHS instructed the company to "Monitor public social communications on the Internet." The records list the websites that will be monitored, including the comments sections of [The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, the Huffington Post, the Drudge Report, Wired, and ABC News.]"
Submitted by bsfootprint on Thu, 09/08/2011 - 14:41
Politicians love to talk about creating jobs.
They love to tell you how they will create jobs. They love to tell you their opponents didn't do it. They love to make you think that job creation is their responsibility. They love to think that they are creating jobs by legislation or executive fiat.
The best thing we can hope for is that politicians don't damage the economy. That they don't discourage job creation in the free market.
And politicians invite criticism by claiming to be able to create jobs: when jobs are lost, or the economy is slow, naturally blame falls on them, probably far more so than is reasonable. But remember: they asked for it.
You'd think they'd learn. You'd think they'd want to stop pushing that line of B.S.
So: Here's the best way for politicians to create jobs.
Are you ready? (Drum roll, please...)
Politicians: If you want to create jobs, here's how you do it. It's so simple, you won't even need a teleprompter. Just follow these easy-peasy steps:
Resign from public office.
Start a business.
Hire people and pay them fair market value for their work.
Turn a profit.
Avoid running afoul of tax, environmental, labor, and myriad other regulations.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
You think you're good at what you do? You think you have what it takes? You think you're a great leader? Let's see what happens when people can choose whether they follow you or not. Whether they will obey your command, or not.
Let's see what happens when people are free to choose whether to buy what you're selling, or not.
Go on, then, prove it. Get out of public life. Join the producers. Compete for customers.
Go out and try navigating the maze of licensing and regulation by which you and your cohorts have shackled free enterprise and productive people.
Go ahead and create some jobs. Some of us may even thank you for it, despite all that divisive anti-capitalistic rhetoric you or your colleagues may have used over the years.
You'll sleep better at night, too.
Go on. Please.
Stop talking about creating jobs, and just go do it.
Submitted by bsfootprint on Mon, 08/29/2011 - 16:48
Scott Locklin opines on recent gnashing and ululating over High Frequency Trading.
Quote:
The anti HFT moral panic is a naked power grab by large firms who don’t want to have to compete with the small businessman. The fact that it is perpetuated by “journalists” who are supposed to be watch guards protecting the little guy is an obscene perversion. Pardon me if I shed no tears for them as they’re made obsolete by the internets. When they stop acting as mouthpieces for the people who are turning my country into a 21st century version of the Byzantine empire, perhaps I’ll develop some sympathy for them.