Skip to main content

FaceBook

Well, duh.

Submitted by bsfootprint on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 18:10
bsfootprint's picture

First, we have The Onion Facebook-CIA faux-expose.

Now this:

In February 2011, the Department of Homeland Security announced that the agency planned to implement a program that would monitor media content, including social media data. The proposed initiatives would gather information from "online forums, blogs, public websites, and messages boards" and disseminate information to "federal, state, local, and foreign government and private sector partners." The program would be executed, in part, by individuals who established fictitious usernames and passwords to create covert social media profiles to spy on other users. The agency stated it would store personal information for up to five years.
[...]
The records reveal that the DHS is paying General Dynamics to monitor the news. The agency instructed the company to monitor for "[media] reports that reflect adversely on the U.S. Government, DHS, or prevent, protect, respond government activities."
[...]
The DHS instructed the company to "Monitor public social communications on the Internet." The records list the websites that will be monitored, including the comments sections of [The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, the Huffington Post, the Drudge Report, Wired, and ABC News.]"

Source: EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security: Media Monitoring via British Tourists Arrested in the U.S. for Tweeting (Bruce Schneier)

All I can say is... what did you expect?

Sources: 
EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security: Media Monitoring (epic.org)
British Tourists Arrested in the U.S. for Tweeting (www.schneier.com)
Filed under
  • Login to post comments
  • Share this

Facebook

Submitted by bsfootprint on Mon, 01/23/2012 - 09:12
bsfootprint's picture

THIS. IS. FUNNY. (Or is it?)

View video

Via Bruce Schneier

Addendum

Privacy? What privacy?

View video

Filed under

Big Deal: BS Footprint on Facebook!

Submitted by bsfootprint on Sat, 09/03/2011 - 18:27
bsfootprint's picture

Big Freakin' Deal. At long last, I've set up a Facebook page for BS Footprint. I'll try to post something unique there on a daily basis.

Hop on over and 'like' it or something.

Leave a comment on the wall, tell me I'm full of BS.

Sources: 
BS Footprint on Facebook (www.facebook.com)
Filed under

The death of the telephone: I won't miss it.

Submitted by bsfootprint on Sat, 03/19/2011 - 10:00
bsfootprint's picture

The New York Times announces the lingering death of the telephone as a primary communications tool.

I've always found the telephone to be an annoyance, interrupting the daily flow, and putting the caller in charge. As Miss Manners (via the New York Times) points out:

Phone calls are rude. Intrusive. Awkward. “Thank you for noticing something that millions of people have failed to notice since the invention of the telephone until just now,” Judith Martin, a k a Miss Manners, said by way of opening our phone conversation. “I’ve been hammering away at this for decades. The telephone has a very rude propensity to interrupt people.”

Continuing, the dynamic duo (NYT/Miss Manners) point out the glaringly obvious:

Though the beast has been somewhat tamed by voice mail and caller ID, the phone caller still insists, Ms. Martin explained, “that we should drop whatever we’re doing and listen to me.”

Roger that. The telephone puts the caller in charge! Ring! Ring! Respond! Pavlov would be proud!

Nails in the coffin

The combination of caller I.D. features, voice mail, and the rise of digital text communications (think e-mail, texting, tweeting, farcebook FaceBook) has put a serious dent in the popularity (ubiquity?) of the telephone as a primary communication mechanism. Call screening is de rigueur for anyone with even a lightly-loaded schedule.

Though a dwindling number of people may prefer the 'talk time' one gets from using the telephone, for most people, the ringing telephone is a bother, viewed with a combination of suspicion and dread: Is it another damn telemarketer? Or a family emergency? The caller I.D. display sorts it out in a hurry, and having the ability to screen calls is wonderfully liberating.

Fixing the telephone's main shortcoming

We can train the telephone to ring only if the caller is 'white listed'–a known and trusted caller–all others go straight to voice mail. That'd be my dream phone, and I know you can buy call screening devices or telmarketing call blockers on the intrawebz.

But why are such devices relegated to niche use? Why would anyone want a promiscuous telephone that accepts disruptions from every drive-by caller? In a sane world, previously unknown callers should go straight to voice mail, no ringing required! And that is the only thing that can save the telephone from its popularity tailspin. I await the next generation of truly smart phones, with built-in caller white listing.

The era of humans running to catch the phone is over. How long before the the telephone (as we know it) is truly dead?

Filed under

Reason #2,121,666 to stay off FaceBook

Submitted by bsfootprint on Fri, 02/04/2011 - 09:50
bsfootprint's picture

This just in, via Wired:

How does a unknown dating site, with the absurd intention of destroying Facebook, launch with 250,000 member profiles on the first day?

Simple.

You scrape data from Facebook.

~snip~

“Facebook, an endlessly cool place for so many people, becomes at the same time a goldmine for identity theft and dating — unfortunately, without the user’s control,” the two explain. “But that’s the very nature of Facebook and social media in general. If we start to play with the concepts of identity theft and dating, we should be able to unveil how fragile a virtual identity given to a proprietary platform can be.”

Sources: 
‘Dating’ Site Imports 250,000 Facebook Profiles, Without Permission (www.wired.com)
Face-to-Facebook (www.face-to-facebook.net)
Filed under