It consists in a lack of concern for the difference between truth and falsity. The motivation of the bullshitter is not to say things that are true or even to say things that are false, but in serving some other purpose. And the question of what he says is true or false is really irrelevant to his pursuit of that ambition. The bullshitter is not necessarily a liar, what he says may very well be true; and he may not think that it's false. I was careful to try to make a distinction between; make clear the differences as I understand it between bullshitters and liars.
Submitted by bsfootprint on Sat, 12/04/2010 - 11:04
I've been following the online global warmingclimate change climate disruption debate of late, and I thought it might be fun to diagram common anthropogenic global warming (AGW) or anthropogenic climate change (ACC) supporter responses to skeptics.
AGW Defender Flowchart
I made this AGW Defender Flowchart, inspired by my encounters reading pro-AGW/ACC and skeptic blogs, and the sometimes amusing "comment debates" (er... flame wars) found therein.
This story begins with Ofcom, the public authority that enforces broadcasting legislation in the UK, telling me that Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth (AIT) is not a ‘factual documentary’, and ends with them deciding that climate change - the subject of the film - is not a matter relating to current public policy. You may well wonder how this could have happened, and it will take some time to explain.